<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet more caching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.freshports.org/2006/01/24/yet-more-caching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.freshports.org/2006/01/24/yet-more-caching/</link>
	<description>News and announcements regarding FreshPorts, The Place For Ports.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: elliot</title>
		<link>http://news.freshports.org/2006/01/24/yet-more-caching/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.freshports.org/2006/01/24/yet-more-caching/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Your file layout on freshports is very intelligent. I would suspect if you put your cache software (apache, or squid) in front, and added the correct expires header with php, you would notice considerable load taken from your database and web server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your file layout on freshports is very intelligent. I would suspect if you put your cache software (apache, or squid) in front, and added the correct expires header with php, you would notice considerable load taken from your database and web server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
