Comments on: Design contest results

By: mato

mato — Wed, 23 May 2007 12:22:02 +0000

Well, option A was visibly slower and more resource intensive (scrolling etc) in Opera 9.2 on WXP than the others. :-((

Besides that I think option B is visually better and more accessible, that is to say you find what you look for more easily, information just stand out more. IMHO.

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:10:46 +0000

By the way, did you randomize the order of the options when they were presented for voting? Otherwise I would expect option A to get the most votes, even if all three options were identical.

By: Dan Langille

Dan Langille — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:04:08 +0000

Yes please.

By: Charles Sprickman

Charles Sprickman — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:24:29 +0000

I think the winning design looks great!

It renders a bit funny in Safari though (and perhaps Konq?).

Want a screenshot?

By: A-Hoernchen

A-Hoernchen — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:38:56 +0000

hmmm, as far as i can see the .png files aren’t loaded correctly. And no matter what i tried i found no way to fix it. But as i can not reproduce the “error” on an other PC i won’t bother you with this. Thanks anyway!

By: Dan Langille

Dan Langille — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:32:16 +0000

If is is broken in Firefox, and I don’t see it broken, please provide a screen shot and details of your browser/OS and we will fix it.

By: A-Hoernchen

A-Hoernchen — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:17:36 +0000

option A is br0ken in firefox, isnt it?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:21:15 +0000

Results are just sad…